[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BB3A1F5.1050902@am.sony.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:26:45 -0700
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To: "swb6@...r.ac.uk" <swb6@...r.ac.uk>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ftrace and Systemtap
On 03/31/2010 10:36 AM, swb6@...r.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
> I am currently writing up my
> dissertation based on dynamic tracing and reducing the learning curve to
> understanding the UNIX kernel. I used two dynamic tracing technologies
> (Systemtap and Dtrace) to monitor some virtual machines on a network.
> Whilst going over my initial review of technologies in the area of dynamic
> tracing I realised I had underestimated ftrace, and even dismissed it as
> not being dynamic. However I read hear (http://lwn.net/Articles/343766/)
> that you were as of July last year trying to introduce a patch that would
> allow ftrace the ability to dynamically trace. Also it would be completely
> instrumented from the command line without the need to compile a kernel
> module al la Systemtap.
>
> My question is do you think Systemtap will be replaced by ftrace in the
> future if so I feel I may need to include this fact in my updated
> technology review.
Systemtap addresses a different set of needs than ftrace.
Ftrace has been dynamic for some time, but in a different way
than Systemtap.
I don't see either system going away soon.
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists