[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270075071.7101.79.camel@pasglop>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:37:51 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 14:57 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> The question still remains what the incremental cost is of doing
> irqsave/irqrestore.
The only other option is to have local_irq_enable() check a global
(system_state ?) before enabling. Almost as gross ...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists