[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100331235353.GA7565@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 01:53:53 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Janak Desai <janak@...ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_unshare: simplify the not-really-implemented
CLONE_THREAD/SIGHAND/VM code
On 03/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> That said, I do not really care about this cleanup. I did it just because
> I sent another patch which touches check_unshare_flags(), and I was really
> surprised that ~70 lines in kernel/fork.c do nothing but confuse the reader.
I changed my mind. I do care ;)
Seriously, Eric, it is just stupid this code does nothing but complicates
fork.c, and unless you prove this patch is wrong you can't convince me
this patch is bad idea.
> Please nack this patch and lets forget it ;)
Yes. You have all rights to nack it and I won't insist even if I disagree.
But please do this explicitly, otherwise I'll resend it.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists