[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100401071040.GU29241@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:10:40 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, joerg.roedel@....com,
hbabu@...ibm.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amd iommu: force flush of iommu prior during shutdown
* Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@...hat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:25:35PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Neil Horman (nhorman@...driver.com) wrote:
> > > Flush iommu during shutdown
> > >
> > > When using an iommu, its possible, if a kdump kernel boot follows a primary
> > > kernel crash, that dma operations might still be in flight from the previous
> > > kernel during the kdump kernel boot. This can lead to memory corruption,
> > > crashes, and other erroneous behavior, specifically I've seen it manifest during
> > > a kdump boot as endless iommu error log entries of the form:
> > > AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT device=00:14.1 domain=0x000d
> > > address=0x000000000245a0c0 flags=0x0070]
> >
> > We've already fixed this problem once before, so some code shift must
> > have brought it back. Personally, I prefer to do this on the bringup
> > path than the teardown path. Besides keeping the teardown path as
> > simple as possible (goal is to get to kdump kernel asap), there's also
> > reason to competely flush on startup in genernal in case BIOS has done
> > anything unsavory.
>
> Can we flush domains (all the I/O TLBs assciated with each domain), during
> initialization? I think all the domain data built by previous kernel will
> be lost and new kernel will have no idea about.
We first invalidate the device table entry, so new translation requests
will see the new domainid for a given BDF. Then we invalidate the
whole set of page tables associated w/ the new domainid. Now all dma
transactions will need page table walk (page tables will be empty excpet
for any 1:1 mappings). Any old domainid's from previous kernel that
aren't found in new device table entries are effectively moot. Just so
happens that in kexec/kdump case, they'll be the same domainid's, but
that doesn't matter.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists