[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100401161927.BE4F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:21:16 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
San Mehat <san@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: pagemap: Hold mmap_sem during page walk
> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:34 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:09:56 +0900
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > + pm.pos = 0;
> > > + start_vaddr += PAGEMAP_WALK_SIZE;
> > > + end = start_vaddr + PAGEMAP_WALK_SIZE;
> >
> > Sigh...this is bad..
> >
> > ==
> > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> >
> > In initial design, walk_page_range() was designed just for walking page table and
> > it didn't require mmap_sem. Now, find_vma() etc.. are used in walk_page_range()
> > and we need mmap_sem around it.
>
> This looks pretty reasonable. However, it also looks very similar to my
> first version of pagemap (which started with double-buffering). It's
> going to need re-testing to make sure it hasn't reintroduced any
> wrapping, alignment, or off-by-one bugs that have already been ironed
> out once or twice.
OK, I'm looking for your test result. :)
Thanks matt for your contribution!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists