[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31146.1270119029@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:50:29 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hpa@...or.com,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org> wrote:
> Any reason not to use the same technique for all the archs
It depends what atomic instructions you have available.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists