lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201004011337.58506.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 1 Apr 2010 13:37:57 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] procfs: Kill the bkl in ioctl

On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> This is a solution that has been tried more than once already. But Linus
> has told he wouldn't pull something that turns the bkl into a mutex or a
> semaphore.

Ok. Starting from the same observation of simplicity in the remaining code,
we should also be able to find a semi-automatic way of turning the BKL usage
in these drivers into a per-module mutex.

> Plus it's quite hard to tell that it does or not auto-release somewhere
> This is often something you can really spot on runtime or on small path
> only.

Well, the autorelease by itself is not needed anywhere. What is needed
is the consequence of autorelease avoiding AB-BA type deadlocks.

> The simple fact the bkl is not always a leaf lock makes it need the
> auto-release, otherwise you experience very bad unexpected lock
> dependencies.

I'm arguing that we can probably show the BKL to be the outermost
lock for the majority of the remaining drivers, which only get it
from their open(), ioctl() or llseek() functions, which are all
called without any locks held. If the BKL is a regular mutex, lockdep
should warn of the other cases.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ