[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100401153547.GB12944@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:35:47 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, w@....eu, david@...morbit.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Stable-review] 4 stable kernel review cycles starting
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 01:23:43PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
> > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 06:40:48 +0200
> >
> >> For this reason, IMHO it helps when submitters can indicate in each
> >> patch the mainline equivalent ID, or alternatively that it's pointless
> >> to look for it because the fix is much different.
> >
> > I put this at the top of every networking/ide/sparc commit message
> > for -stable submissions I make.
> >
> > In fact I thought that was a requirement for -stable submissions?
>
> It is a documented requirement, perhaps not very clearly worded in The
> Submitter's Guide To Stable...
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=46cdf871d9970b9252469531f9efd4a17243bb0b
Patches always welcome to make that file easier to understand.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists