[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BB4C0F5.3070204@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:51:17 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [COUNTERPATCH] mm: avoid overflowing preempt_count() in mmu_take_all_locks()
On 04/01/2010 06:42 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>> I've almost got a patch done that converts those two, still need to look
>>> where that tasklist_lock muck happens.
>>>
>> OK, so the below builds and boots, only need to track down that
>> tasklist_lock nesting, but I got to run an errand first.
>>
> You should have a look at my old patchset where Christoph already
> implemented this (and not for decreasing latency but to allow
> scheduling in mmu notifier handlers, only needed by XPMEM):
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.26-rc7/mmu-notifier-v18/
>
> The ugliest part of it (that I think you missed below) is the breakage
> of the RCU locking in the anon-vma which requires adding refcounting
> to it. That was the worst part of the conversion as far as I can tell.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.26-rc7/mmu-notifier-v18/anon-vma
>
Can we use srcu now instead?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists