[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1004011200330.30661@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
anfei <anfei.zhou@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] oom: fix the unsafe usage of badness() in
proc_oom_score()
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> proc_oom_score(task) have a reference to task_struct, but that is all.
> If this task was already released before we take tasklist_lock
>
> - we can't use task->group_leader, it points to nowhere
>
> - it is not safe to call badness() even if this task is
> ->group_leader, has_intersects_mems_allowed() assumes
> it is safe to iterate over ->thread_group list.
>
> - even worse, badness() can hit ->signal == NULL
>
> Add the pid_alive() check to ensure __unhash_process() was not called.
>
> Also, use "task" instead of task->group_leader. badness() should return
> the same result for any sub-thread. Currently this is not true, but
> this should be changed anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Andrew, this is 2.6.34 material and should be backported to stable. It's
not introduced by the recent oom killer rewrite pending in -mm, but it
will require a trivial merge resolution on that work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists