[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BB50938.9040000@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:59:36 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibft, x86: Change reserve_ibft_region() to find_ibft_region()
On 04/01/2010 01:12 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 07:07:32PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>>
>> So arch code could decide the way to reserve the ibft.
>>
>> And We should reserve ibft as early as possible, instead of BOOTMEM stage,
>> in case the table is in RAM range and is not reserved by BIOS.
>
> What test vehicle did you use to find this bug?
code review for CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
reserve_bootmem() should only be used for converting entries reserved by reserved_early()
so When we are using CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM, reserve_bootmem() is killed.
>
>
> .. snip..
>> + if (size)
>> + reserve_early_overlap_ok(addr, addr + size, "ifbt");
> ^^^^ - ibft
thanks, will change it.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists