lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100401024421.GA5877@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:44:21 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, joerg.roedel@....com,
	hbabu@...ibm.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amd iommu: force flush of iommu prior during shutdown

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:25:35PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Neil Horman (nhorman@...driver.com) wrote:
> > Flush iommu during shutdown
> > 
> > When using an iommu, its possible, if a kdump kernel boot follows a primary
> > kernel crash, that dma operations might still be in flight from the previous
> > kernel during the kdump kernel boot.  This can lead to memory corruption,
> > crashes, and other erroneous behavior, specifically I've seen it manifest during
> > a kdump boot as endless iommu error log entries of the form:
> > AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT device=00:14.1 domain=0x000d
> > address=0x000000000245a0c0 flags=0x0070]
> 
> We've already fixed this problem once before, so some code shift must
> have brought it back.  Personally, I prefer to do this on the bringup
> path than the teardown path.  Besides keeping the teardown path as
> simple as possible (goal is to get to kdump kernel asap), there's also
> reason to competely flush on startup in genernal in case BIOS has done
> anything unsavory.

Can we flush domains (all the I/O TLBs assciated with each domain), during
initialization? I think all the domain data built by previous kernel will
be lost and new kernel will have no idea about. 

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ