| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-1445c08d06c5594895b4fae952ef8a457e89c390@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:12:00 GMT
From: tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: move_task_off_dead_cpu(): Take rq->lock around select_fallback_rq()
Commit-ID: 1445c08d06c5594895b4fae952ef8a457e89c390
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1445c08d06c5594895b4fae952ef8a457e89c390
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:10:10 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:12:01 +0200
sched: move_task_off_dead_cpu(): Take rq->lock around select_fallback_rq()
move_task_off_dead_cpu()->select_fallback_rq() reads/updates ->cpus_allowed
lockless. We can race with set_cpus_allowed() running in parallel.
Change it to take rq->lock around select_fallback_rq(). Note that it is not
trivial to move this spin_lock() into select_fallback_rq(), we must recheck
the task was not migrated after we take the lock and other callers do not
need this lock.
To avoid the races with other callers of select_fallback_rq() which rely on
TASK_WAKING, we also check p->state != TASK_WAKING and do nothing otherwise.
The owner of TASK_WAKING must update ->cpus_allowed and choose the correct
CPU anyway, and the subsequent __migrate_task() is just meaningless because
p->se.on_rq must be false.
Alternatively, we could change select_task_rq() to take rq->lock right
after it calls sched_class->select_task_rq(), but this looks a bit ugly.
Also, change it to not assume irqs are disabled and absorb __migrate_task_irq().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20100315091010.GA9131@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index c0b3ebc..27774b5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -5448,29 +5448,29 @@ static int migration_thread(void *data)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-
-static int __migrate_task_irq(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu)
-{
- int ret;
-
- local_irq_disable();
- ret = __migrate_task(p, src_cpu, dest_cpu);
- local_irq_enable();
- return ret;
-}
-
/*
* Figure out where task on dead CPU should go, use force if necessary.
*/
static void move_task_off_dead_cpu(int dead_cpu, struct task_struct *p)
{
- int dest_cpu;
-
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(dead_cpu);
+ int needs_cpu, uninitialized_var(dest_cpu);
+ unsigned long flags;
again:
- dest_cpu = select_fallback_rq(dead_cpu, p);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+ needs_cpu = (task_cpu(p) == dead_cpu) && (p->state != TASK_WAKING);
+ if (needs_cpu)
+ dest_cpu = select_fallback_rq(dead_cpu, p);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
/* It can have affinity changed while we were choosing. */
- if (unlikely(!__migrate_task_irq(p, dead_cpu, dest_cpu)))
+ if (needs_cpu)
+ needs_cpu = !__migrate_task(p, dead_cpu, dest_cpu);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ if (unlikely(needs_cpu))
goto again;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists