[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100402204446.GD21840@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:44:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Utilize the LBRs for machine/oops
debugging
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 19:02 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Plus, it would be nice to have a sysctl entry for this as well - so that
> > production systems can enable this if they want to enrich the output of
> > some difficult-to-analyze kernel crash, without yet another reboot.
>
> Right, could do, but once it crashed it clearly to late to enable anything
> ;-)
No. What i mean is that with your patch, a debugging session would go like
this:
< kernel crashes > # reboot #1
< admin logs in and scratches head >
< admin consults kernel hackers and enables lbr_debug=1 in /etc/grub.conf >
< admin reboots > # reboot #2
< kernel crashes again > # reboot #3
With the sysctl we'd have one reboot less:
< kernel crashes > # reboot #1
< admin logs in and scratches head >
< admin consults kernel hackers and tweaks /proc/sys/kernel/x86/lbr_debug >
< kernel crashes again > # reboot #2
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists