[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100401.172635.38081142.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: amwang@...hat.com
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jpirko@...hat.com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Patch V3] bonding: fix potential deadlock in bond_uninit()
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:30:52 +0800
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> writes:
>>
>>> bond_uninit() is invoked with rtnl_lock held, when it does
>>> destroy_workqueue()
>>> which will potentially flush all works in this workqueue, if we hold
>>> rtnl_lock
>>> again in the work function, it will deadlock.
>>>
>>> So move destroy_workqueue() to destructor where rtnl_lock is not held
>>> any more,
>>> suggested by Eric.
>> The error handling on creating a bond device needs to be updated as
>> well.
>>
>
> Done.
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists