lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 03 Apr 2010 01:58:23 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <>
To:	Kay Sievers <>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>, Greg KH <>,, Tejun Heo <>,
	Cornelia Huck <>,,
	Eric Dumazet <>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <>,
	Serge Hallyn <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] tagged sysfs support

On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 07:51 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:04, Eric W. Biederman <> wrote:
> > Kay Sievers <> writes:
> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 20:30, Eric W. Biederman <> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The main short coming of using multiple network namespaces today
> >>> is that only network devices for the primary network namespaces
> >>> can be put in the kobject layer and sysfs.
> >>>
> >>> This is essentially the earlier version of this patchset that was
> >>> reviewed before, just now on top of a version of sysfs that doesn't
> >>> need cleanup patches to support it.
> >>
> >> Just to check if we are not in conflict with planned changes, and how
> >> to possibly handle them:
> >>
> >> There is the plan and ongoing work to unify classes and buses, export
> >> them at /sys/subsystem in the same layout of the current /sys/bus/.
> >> The decision to export buses and classes as two different things
> >> (which they aren't) is the last major piece in the sysfs layout which
> >> needs to be fixed.
> >
> > Interesting.  We will symlinks ie:
> > /sys/class -> /sys/subsystem
> > /sys/bus -> /sys/subsystem
> > to keep from breaking userspace.
> Yeah, /sys/bus/, which is the only sane layout of the needlessly
> different 3 versions of the same thing (bus, class, block).

block vs class/block is arguable, but as for abstracting the difference
between bus and class... why?

Each bus defines a device interface covering enumeration,
identification, power management and various aspects of their connection
to the host.  This interface is implemented by the bus driver.

Each class defines a device interface covering functionality provided to
user-space or higher level kernel components (block interface to
filesystems, net driver interface to the networking core, etc).  This
interface is implemented by multiple device-specific drivers.

So while buses and classes both define device interfaces, they are
fundamentally different types of interface.  And there are 'subsystems'
that don't have devices at all (time, RCU, perf, ...).  If you're going
to expose the set of subsystems, don't they belong in there?  But then,
what would you put in their directories?


Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists