[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BB84991.5080301@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 17:10:57 +0900
From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Floating point exception by perf record
Hi Arnaldo,
I suffered a mysterious floating point exception when executing perf
on current tip/master.
For example,
% sudo ./perf lock record ./perf bench sched messaging
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 1.375 [sec]
[ perf record: Woken up 0 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 160.002 MB perf.data (~6990599 samples) ]
[1] 26348 floating point exception sudo ./perf lock record ./perf
bench sched messaging
dmesg says that
[10212.752490] perf[26348] trap divide error ip:7fade8564310
sp:7fff46d926e8 error:0 in libnewt.so.0.52.2[7fade8556000+15000]
Example is of perf lock, but this is not a special phenomenon of perf lock,
other users of perf record, like perf sched, caused the same problem.
I found that this might be caused by the line 283 of perf.c
if (fclose(stdout)) # <- closing stdout!
die("close failed on standard output: %s", strerror(errno));
I don't know well about libnewt, do you know something like cause?
The version of libnewt I'm using is 0.52.2 (default of Debian lenny)
Thanks,
Hitoshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists