[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <007c01cad4e4$26c5a700$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:19:29 -0500
From: "Madhusudhan" <madhu.cr@...com>
To: <me@...ipebalbi.com>,
"'kishore kadiyala'" <kishorek.kadiyala@...il.com>
Cc: "'Vimal Singh'" <vimal.newwork@...il.com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<svenkatr@...com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jarkko.lavinen@...ia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's peformance.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:me@...ipebalbi.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:49 AM
> To: kishore kadiyala
> Cc: Madhusudhan; Vimal Singh; tony@...mide.com; svenkatr@...com; linux-
> omap@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> jarkko.lavinen@...ia.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's
> peformance.
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:26:16PM +0530, kishore kadiyala wrote:
> > @@ -2091,9 +2091,9 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED |
> > MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
> >
> > - if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8)
> > - mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> > - else if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 4)
> > + if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 8)
> > + mmc->caps |= (MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA);
> > + else if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 4)
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>
> I believe it would be enough to just remove the 'else', so the code
> would look like:
>
> if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 4)
Since the first if command already checks for the 8-bit the second check
like >= 4 is definitely not readable in my opinion.
Functionally do you see anything wrong with this patch??
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
>
> --
> balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists