linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] NFS: Fix RCU warnings in nfs_inode_return_delegation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100405175754.GE2525@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:57:54 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Fix RCU warnings in
 nfs_inode_return_delegation_noreclaim() [ver #2]

On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:46:51PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > So you have objected to needless memory barriers.  How do you feel
> > about possibly needless ACCESS_ONCE() calls?
> 
> That would work here since it shouldn't emit any excess instructions.

And here is the corresponding patch.  Seem reasonable?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 rcupdate.h |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

commit 61ad1405cd442fe54f87ff97febf52610817903e
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 5 10:52:53 2010 -0700

    rcu: add rcu_dereference_protect to avoid smp_read_barrier_depends overhead
    
    This patch adds a variant of rcu_dereference() that handles situations
    where the RCU-protected data structure cannot change, perhaps due to
    our holding the update-side lock, or where the RCU-protected pointer is
    only to be tested, not dereferenced.
    
    Suggested-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 872a98e..123b834 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -209,9 +209,28 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
 		rcu_dereference_raw(p); \
 	})
 
+/**
+ * rcu_dereference_protected - fetch RCU pointer when protected by algorithm
+ *
+ * Return the value of the specified RCU-protected pointer, but omit
+ * the smp_read_barrier_depends() and keep the ACCESS_ONCE().  This
+ * is useful in cases where update-side locks prevent the value of the
+ * pointer from changing, and is also useful in cases where the value
+ * of this pointer is accessed, but the pointer is not dereferenced.
+ * An example of this latter occurs when testing an RCU-protected
+ * pointer against NULL.
+ */
+#define rcu_dereference_protected(p, c) \
+	({ \
+		if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !(c)) \
+			lockdep_rcu_dereference(__FILE__, __LINE__); \
+		ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
+	})
+
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
 
 #define rcu_dereference_check(p, c)	rcu_dereference_raw(p)
+#define rcu_dereference_protected(p, c)	ACCESS_ONCE(p)
 
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/