[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BBA52DD.2000602@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:15:09 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: guenter.roeck@...csson.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] x86: Do not write to VGA memory space if CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE
is undefined
On 04/05/2010 02:11 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/05/2010 02:04 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>> Would you accept a minimized patch like this ?
>>
>> /* Direct interface for emergencies */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE
>> static struct console *early_console = &early_vga_console;
>> +#else
>> +static struct console *early_console = &early_serial_console;
>> +#endif
>> static int __initdata early_console_initialized;
>>
>> This would prevent the problem while minimizing changes, and at the same
>> time permit early messages to be written to the serial console.
>>
>
> I'm unhappy about it, because *those early messages shouldn't exist in
> the first place*. It seems to be an indication that we're invoking
> setup_early_printk() too late. The whole playing around with max_xpos
> and max_ypos instead of using boot_params.screen_info directly is
> particularly bleacherous.
>
> I would at least like to see if the improper invocation of
> early_printk() can be avoided.
>
Specifically: is this anything other than "Kernel alive\n"?
If it's just "Kernel alive\n" I say drop it on the floor.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists