[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270479150.19685.14793.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:52:30 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: kill wrong message when cat tracing/trace
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:11 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Because of a local variable is not initialized, I got these
> when I did 'cat tracing/trace'. (not trace_pipe):
>
> CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
> ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
> CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
> ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
> CPU:0 [LOST 18446612133255294080 EVENTS]
> ps-3099 [000] 560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
> CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
> ps-3099 [000] 560.770222: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
> CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
> ps-3099 [000] 560.770222: lock_release: ffffffff816cfb98 dcache_lock
>
> See peek_next_entry(), it does not set *lost_events when we 'cat tracing/trace'
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Applied, Thanks Lai!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists