lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270480644.19685.14822.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:17:24 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH][GIT PULL] tracing: Fix uninitialized variable of
 tracing/trace output


Ingo,

Please pull the latest tip/tracing/core tree, which can be found at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
tip/tracing/core


Lai Jiangshan (1):
      tracing: Fix uninitialized variable of tracing/trace output

----
 kernel/trace/trace.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---------------------------
commit aa27497c2fb4c7f57706099bd489e683e5cc3e3b
Author: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 5 17:11:05 2010 +0800

    tracing: Fix uninitialized variable of tracing/trace output
    
    Because a local variable is not initialized, I got these
    when I did 'cat tracing/trace'. (not trace_pipe):
    
    CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
                  ps-3099  [000]   560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
    CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
                  ps-3099  [000]   560.770221: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
    CPU:0 [LOST 18446612133255294080 EVENTS]
                  ps-3099  [000]   560.770221: lock_acquire: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
    CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
                  ps-3099  [000]   560.770222: lock_release: ffff880030865010 &(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock
    CPU:0 [LOST 18446744071579453134 EVENTS]
                  ps-3099  [000]   560.770222: lock_release: ffffffff816cfb98 dcache_lock
    
    See peek_next_entry(), it does not set *lost_events when we 'cat tracing/trace'
    
    Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
    LKML-Reference: <4BB9A929.2000303@...fujitsu.com>
    Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 0498beb..b9be232 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ __find_next_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter, int *ent_cpu,
 {
 	struct ring_buffer *buffer = iter->tr->buffer;
 	struct trace_entry *ent, *next = NULL;
-	unsigned long lost_events, next_lost = 0;
+	unsigned long lost_events = 0, next_lost = 0;
 	int cpu_file = iter->cpu_file;
 	u64 next_ts = 0, ts;
 	int next_cpu = -1;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ