[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BBB3BB1.4070501@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:48:33 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
CC: yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: REPOST cleanup debug message in init_kstat_irqs()
Whoops... Subject should have been REPOST cleanup debug message in
irq_to_desc_alloc_node()
Sorry 'bout that.
P.
Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> [Sending to a wider audience this time, cc'ing Andrew and Ingo directly]
>
> Clean up debug messages in irq_to_desc_alloc_node().
>
> This debug message can result in valid output like
>
> alloc irq_desc for 73 on node -1
>
> which looks like alot like an error message.
>
> This debug statement has been in the kernel for about a year, so I think it is
> safe to remove it and report the irq and node in the error case instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> index 17c71bb..5c3e38e 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -224,9 +224,10 @@ struct irq_desc * __ref irq_to_desc_alloc_node(unsigned int irq, int node)
> else
> desc = alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(node), sizeof(*desc));
>
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG " alloc irq_desc for %d on node %d\n", irq, node);
> if (!desc) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "can not alloc irq_desc\n");
> + printk(KERN_ERR
> + "can not alloc irq_desc for irq %d on node %d\n",
> + irq, node);
> BUG_ON(1);
> }
> init_one_irq_desc(irq, desc, node);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists