[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270562948.1595.442.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:09:08 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Peter W. Morreale" <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@...ell.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
John Cooper <john.cooper@...rd-harmonic.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6][RFC] futex: FUTEX_LOCK with optional adaptive
spinning
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:41 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 04:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:28 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, but that's the best case for spinning. You could simply use a
> >> userspace spinlock in this case.
> >>
> > Userspace spinlocks are evil.. they should _never_ be used.
> >
>
> But in this case they're fastest. If we don't provide a non-evil
> alternative, people will use them.
>
That's what FUTEX_LOCK is about.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists