[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100406143635.GA12315@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:36:35 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Grzegorz Nosek <root@...aldomain.pl>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Biederman Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: Testing lxc 0.6.5 in Fedora 13
On 04/06, Matt Helsley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:44:43PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > tracehook_report_clone_complete() call is made when that task_struct is no
> > longer guaranteed to be valid.
Hmm. I missed this.
> Also, if utrace allows multiple tracers and they each
> exist in a different namespace then storing a pid nr isn't going to work.
Yes, but utrace is simple. ptrace_report_clone() does
ctx->eventmsg = child->pid;
we should fix this line and that is all, afaics. Every tracer has a
separate "struct ptrace_context *ctx".
> So my hunch is, in the long run, we'll need to hold a reference there and
> drop it when the last tracer detaches
Without utrace only one tracer is possible.
So, I think we should either change do_fork() to get the right tracee_pid_nr,
or add get/put into do_fork() and change tracehooks as Roland suggested.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists