[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270567653.20295.11.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:27:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Store active software events in a hashlist
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 16:08 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Each time a software event triggers, we need to walk through
> the entire list of events from the current cpu and task contexts
> to retrieve a running perf event that matches.
> We also need to check a matching perf event is actually counting.
>
> This walk is wasteful and makes the event fast path scaling
> down with a growing number of events running on the same
> contexts.
>
> To solve this, we store the running perf events in a hashlist to
> get an immediate access to them against their type:event_id when
> they trigger.
So we have a hash-table per-cpu, each event takes a ref on the hash
table, when the thing is empty we free it.
When the event->cpu == -1 (all cpus) we take a ref on all possible cpu's
hash-table (should be online I figure, but that requires adding a
hotplug handler).
Then on event enable/disable we actually add the event to the hash-table
belonging to the cpu the event/task gets scheduled on, since each event
can only ever be active on one cpu.
Right?
So looks good, altough I think we want to do that online/hotplug thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists