linux-kernel - [patch] jbd: tag journal writes as metadata I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <x49eiisr0a2.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:52:37 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	Jan Kara <jack@....cz>
Subject: [patch] jbd: tag journal writes as metadata I/O

Hi,

In running iozone for writes to small files, we noticed a pretty big
discrepency between the performance of the deadline and cfq I/O
schedulers.  Investigation showed that I/O was being issued from 2
different contexts: the iozone process itself, and the jbd/sdh-8 thread
(as expected).  Because of the way cfq performs slice idling, the delays
introduced between the metadata and data I/Os were significant.  For
example, cfq would see about 7MB/s versus deadline's 35 for the same
workload.  I also tested fs_mark with writing and fsyncing 1000 64k
files, and a similar 5x performance difference was observed.  Eric
Sandeen suggested that I flag the journal writes as metadata, and once I
did that, the performance difference went away completely (cfq has
special logic to prioritize metadata I/O).

This is similar to the jbd2 patch I posted earlier that Ted has accepted
into his patch queue.  Comments, as always, are appreciated.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>

diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c
index 4bd8825..e9f1369 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
 	int first_tag = 0;
 	int tag_flag;
 	int i;
-	int write_op = WRITE;
+	int write_op = WRITE_META;

 	/*
 	 * First job: lock down the current transaction and wait for
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
 	 * instead we rely on sync_buffer() doing the unplug for us.
 	 */
 	if (commit_transaction->t_synchronous_commit)
-		write_op = WRITE_SYNC_PLUG;
+		write_op = WRITE_SYNC_PLUG | (1<<BIO_RW_META);
 	spin_lock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
 	while (commit_transaction->t_updates) {
 		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/