[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270572866.1711.10.camel@barrios-desktop>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 01:54:26 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Ugly rmap NULL ptr deref oopsie on hibernate (was Linux
2.6.34-rc3)
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:32 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think so. That isn't the racy case. We're working with a
> > > anon_vma_chain, so the anonvma is all there.
> >
> > But the anon_vma is using for another anon_vma.
>
> No, that can only happen if somebody has done "anon_vma_free()" on it. And
> nobody does that if the anonvma still has a non-empty'&anon_vma->head'.
>
> So as long as the anon_vma has a anon_vma_chain entry associated with it
> (or a ksm refcount, but that's a separate issue), it's not going to be
> re-allocated for any other use, because it's not going to be free'd.
>
> Linus
That's what I am missing.
Thanks, Linus.
I will think over the problem. :)
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists