| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20100406162900.aa197178.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:29:00 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/development-process: add info on maintainers On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:26:36 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:17:05 -0700 > Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote: > > > +- Please note that most maintainers also have day jobs, so merging > > + your patch may not be their highest priority. If your patch is > > + getting feedback about changes that are needed, you should either > > + make those changes or justify why they should not be made. If your > > + patch has no review complaints but is not being merged by its > > + appropriate subsystem or driver maintainer, you should be persistent > > + in updating the patch to the current kernel so that it applies cleanly > > + and keep sending it for review & merging. > > I'd prefer to spell out "and" in that last line, being the sort of > person that I am. Either way: > > Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> OK, I'll change that. Thanks for looking. --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists