[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100406012113.GA18672@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:21:13 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] acpi_pad: "processor_aggregator" name too long
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:41:22PM +0800, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> cpi_device_class can only be 19 characters and a NULL terminator.
>
> With the current name we get a buffer overflow in acpi_pad_add()
> strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS);
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> ---
> V2: Thanks to Pavel Machek for coming up with the right name for this.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> index 7e52295..790aaa1 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
> #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
>
> -#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS "processor_aggregator"
> +#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS "cpu_aggregator"
> #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_DEVICE_NAME "Processor Aggregator"
> #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY 0x80
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(isolated_cpus_lock);
sorry for being later to reply. Better the name could be 'acpi_pad', which
is what the spec called. cpu_aggregator looks like a invented name.
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists