linux-kernel - Re: mprotect pgprot handling weirdness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1270532622.13812.30.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:43:42 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mprotect pgprot handling weirdness

On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:09 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> (*) Right now it's near impossible to add arch specific PROT_* bits to
> mmap/mprotect for fancy things like cachability attributes, or other
> nifty things like reverse-endian mappings that we have on some embedded
> platforms, I'm investigating ways to better separate vm_page_prot from
> vm_flags so some PROT_* bits can go straight to the former without
> having to be mirrored in some way in the later.

The other (easier) option is to make the vm flags always 64-bit and
reserve a range of bits here for the arch to use but I suppose there's
going to be unhappiness about that one :-)

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/