[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100406074901.GB9662@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:49:02 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: "Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"jdike@...user-mode-linux.org" <jdike@...user-mode-linux.org>,
"yzhao81@...il.com" <yzhao81@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] A device for zero-copy based on KVM virtio-net.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:41:37PM +0800, Xin, Xiaohui wrote:
> Michael,
> >>
> >>For the DOS issue, I'm not sure how much the limit get_user_pages()
> >> can pin is reasonable, should we compute the bindwidth to make it?
>
> >There's a ulimit for locked memory. Can we use this, decreasing
> >the value for rlimit array? We can do this when backend is
> >enabled and re-increment when backend is disabled.
>
> I have tried it with rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur, but I found
> the initial value for it is 0x10000, after right shift PAGE_SHIFT,
> it's only 16 pages we can lock then, it seems too small, since the
> guest virito-net driver may submit a lot requests one time.
>
>
> Thanks
> Xiaohui
Yes, that's the default, but system administrator can always increase
this value with ulimit if necessary.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists