linux-kernel - Re: Arch specific mmap attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:00:11 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Arch specific mmap attributes

On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 16:14 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Desktop already uses similar features via PCI mmap
> > attributes and such, not to mention MSR settings on
> > x86.
> 
> Probably I haven't catch your mention. Why userland process
> need to change PCI mmap attribute by mmap(2)? It seems kernel issue.

There are cases where the userspace based driver needs to control
attributes such as write combining, or even cachability when mapping PCI
devices directly into userspace.

It's not -that- common, though X still does it on a number of platforms,
and there are people still trying to run PCI drivers in userspace ;-) 

But regardless. I don't see why HPC or Embedded would have to be
qualified as "crap" and not warrant our full attention into devising
something sane and clean anyways.

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/