[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270641500.20295.807.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:58:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Store active software events in a hashlist
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 13:56 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> >
> > So looks good, altough I think we want to do that online/hotplug thing.
>
>
> That would let us allocate on online cpus instead of possibles? Yeah right.
Right, so if you want to go this route (and not simply embed it in the
percpu data), the complication I thought of is that you want the
refcount on offline cpus but not the allocation, since its very hard to
reconstruct the number of events that had event->cpu == -1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists