[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p2k84144f021004070825jd3530d04v9d339c8d50c4593d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:25:31 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: ShiYong LI <a22381@...orola.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
mpm@...enic.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, tghk48@...orola.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix missing of last user while dumping slab corruption
log
Hi,
(I'm cc'ing David who did some fixes in this area previously.)
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:21 AM, ShiYong LI <a22381@...orola.com> wrote:
> Even with SLAB_RED_ZONE and SLAB_STORE_USER enabled, kernel would NOT
> store redzone and last user data around allocated memory space if arch
> cache line > sizeof(unsigned long long). As a result, last user information
> is unexpectedly MISSED while dumping slab corruption log.
>
> This patch makes sure that redzone and last user tags get stored whatever
> arch cache line.
>
> Compared to original codes, the change surely affects head redzone (redzone1).
> Actually, with SLAB_RED_ZONE and SLAB_STORE_USER enabled,
> allocated memory layout is as below:
>
> [ redzone1 ] <--------- Affected area.
> [ real object space ]
> [ redzone2 ]
> [ last user ]
> [ ... ]
>
> Let's do some analysis: (whatever SLAB_STORE_USER is).
>
> 1) With SLAB_RED_ZONE on, "align" >= sizeof(unsigned long long) according to
> the following codes:
> /* 2) arch mandated alignment */
> if (ralign < ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN) {
> ralign = ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN;
> }
> /* 3) caller mandated alignment */
> if (ralign < align) {
> ralign = align;
> }
> ...
> /*
> * 4) Store it.
> */
> align = ralign;
>
> That's to say, could guarantee that redzone1 does NOT get broken
> at all. Meanwhile,
> Real object space could meet the need of cache line size by using
> "align" argument.
>
> 2) With SLAB_RED_ZONE off, the change has no impact.
>
>
> From 03b28964311090533643acd267abe0cbc3c9b0a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Shiyong Li <shi-yong.li@...orola.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:50:30 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix missing of last user info while getting
> DEBUG_SLAB config enabled.
>
> Even with SLAB_RED_ZONE and SLAB_STORE_USER enabled, kernel would NOT
> store redzone and last user data around allocated memory space if arch
> cache line > sizeof(unsigned long long). As a result, last user information
> is unexpectedly MISSED while dumping slab corruption log.
>
> This fix makes sure that redzone and last user tags get stored whatever
> cache line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiyong Li <shi-yong.li@...orola.com>
> ---
> mm/slab.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index a8a38ca..84af997 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -2267,9 +2267,6 @@ kmem_cache_create (const char *name, size_t
> size, size_t align,
> if (ralign < align) {
> ralign = align;
> }
> - /* disable debug if necessary */
> - if (ralign > __alignof__(unsigned long long))
> - flags &= ~(SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER);
> /*
> * 4) Store it.
> */
> @@ -2289,8 +2286,8 @@ kmem_cache_create (const char *name, size_t
> size, size_t align,
> */
> if (flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE) {
> /* add space for red zone words */
> - cachep->obj_offset += sizeof(unsigned long long);
> - size += 2 * sizeof(unsigned long long);
> + cachep->obj_offset += align;
> + size += align + sizeof(unsigned long long);
> }
> if (flags & SLAB_STORE_USER) {
> /* user store requires one word storage behind the end of
The problem I have with this patch is that I am unable to convince
myself that it's correct.
The code in question is pretty hard to follow and it can break on
architectures with strict alignment requirements. I'm not sure I fully
understand why we've been disabling debugging in the first place.
On which architectures have you verified this fix?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists