[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <op.vastr9n67p4s8u@pikus>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:39:35 +0200
From: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
Rupesh Gujare <rupeshgujare@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] USB: composite: allow optional removal of __init and
__exit tags
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:41:28PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> The composite framework has been written using __init and __exit tags
>> to mark init and exit functions as such. This works with most of the
>> composite gadgets however some may need to call init/exit functions
>> during normal operations. One example is mass storage gadget which
>> needs to call exit functions.
>>
>> This patch allows gadgets to define USB_NO_INIT_SEGMENT or
>> USB_NO_EXIT_SEGMENT to remove the __init and __exit declarations
>> from composite framework.
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:28:52 +0200, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> How about we just drop the __init and __exit tags completly and then
> we don't have to propagate this mess any further?
Personally, I don't care, ;) so if you think it's better to drop it all
together I can change it in a future patch.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +---[mina86@...a86.com]---[mina86@...ber.org]---ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists