[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270683534.9521.8.camel@concordia>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:38:54 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/33] x86, lmb: turn off ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 19:17 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 32bit now can use generic __find_lmb_area now. So we can turn arch one off
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 1aa53ae..ce097ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG
> a paravirt_op is missing when it is called.
>
> config ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA
> - default y
> + default n
> bool "Use x86 own lmb_find_area()"
> ---help---
> Use lmb_find_area() version instead of generic version, it get free
So can't the whole ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA go away then? And the generic
version be made non-weak?
cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists