[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BBD17E9.1020509@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:40:25 -0700
From: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
To: michael@...erman.id.au
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/33] x86, lmb: turn off ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA
On 04/07/2010 04:38 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 19:17 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> 32bit now can use generic __find_lmb_area now. So we can turn arch one off
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index 1aa53ae..ce097ab 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG
>> a paravirt_op is missing when it is called.
>>
>> config ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA
>> - default y
>> + default n
>> bool "Use x86 own lmb_find_area()"
>> ---help---
>> Use lmb_find_area() version instead of generic version, it get free
>
> So can't the whole ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA go away then? And the generic
> version be made non-weak?
Later after more test, to make sure x86 could endure from high to low.
then we can remove ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists