[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100408174549.2f45ceea.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 17:45:49 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: powerpc boot failure
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:29:49 +0300 Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi> wrote:
>
> You don't probably have any xfrm policies then. And that code should not
> really get executed.
>
> Some of the changes touch globally visible structs, and inline functions.
> Was this a clean rebuild? And did you update all kernel modules, also in
> the initramfs?
Yes, the build is started from scratch and the kernel and modules are
updated (this is our automated build and test system).
I have attached the config in case that is of use.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
View attachment "dotconfig.txt" of type "text/plain" (50513 bytes)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists