[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1270714195.2215.14.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:09:55 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
alex.shi@...el.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ma, Ling" <ling.ma@...el.com>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 09:54 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 15:54 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin a écrit :
>
> > If there are 2 nodes in the machine, processes on node 0 will contact MCH of
> > node 1 to access memory of node 1. I suspect the MCH of node 1 might enter
> > a power-saving mode when all the cpus of node 1 are free. So the transactions
> > from MCH 1 to MCH 0 has a larger latency.
> >
>
> Hmm, thanks for the hint, I will investigate this.
Oh well,
perf timechart record &
Instant crash
Call Trace:
perf_trace_sched_switch+0xd5/0x120
schedule+0x6b5/0x860
retint_careful+0xd/0x21
RIP ffffffff81010955 perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs+0x15/0x40
CR2: 00000000d21f1422
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists