[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BBDC0CC.7080305@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:41:00 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-04-05-16-09 uploaded
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:09:45 PDT, akpm@...ux-foundation.org said:
>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2010-04-05-16-09 has been uploaded to
>>
>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>
> Seen in dmesg, 2.6.34-rc2-mmotm0323 didn't do this. Tossing it at all the
> likely suspects, hopefully somebody will recognize it and save me the
> bisecting. ;)
>
> [ 11.488535] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink.
> [ 11.488579]
> [ 11.488579] ===================================================
> [ 11.489529] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> [ 11.489988] ---------------------------------------------------
> [ 11.490494] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c:88 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> [ 11.491024]
> [ 11.491024] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 11.491025]
> [ 11.492834]
> [ 11.492835] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> [ 11.494124] 1 lock held by swapper/1:
> [ 11.494776] #0: (nf_ct_ecache_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8148c606>] nf_conntrack_register_notifier+0x1a/0x76
> [ 11.495505]
There are some unnecessary rcu_dereference() calls in the conntrack
notifier registration and unregistration functions.
Does this fix it?
View attachment "x" of type "text/plain" (1835 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists