[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BBDC92D.8060503@humyo.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:16:45 +0100
From: John Berthels <john@...yo.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nick Gregory <nick@...yo.com>,
Rob Sanderson <rob@...yo.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks, heavy
write load, 8k stack, x86-64
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:43:41AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> And there's a patch attached that stops direct reclaim from writing
> back dirty pages - it seems to work fine from some rough testing
> I've done. Perhaps you might want to give it a spin on a
> test box, John?
>
Thanks very much for this. The patch is in and soaking on a THREAD_ORDER
1 kernel (2.6.33.2 + patch + stack instrumentation), so far so good, but
it's early days. After about 2hrs of uptime:
$ dmesg | grep stack | tail -1
[ 60.350766] apache2 used greatest stack depth: 2544 bytes left
(which tallies well with your 5 1/2Kbytes usage figure).
I'll reply again after it's been running long enough to draw conclusions.
jb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists