[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100408101925.FB9F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:03:27 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
sgunderson@...foot.com, hannes@...xchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] rmap: make anon_vma_prepare link in all the anon_vmas of a mergeable VMA
Hi
Wow, your patch is very cool. I'm surprising such 20 lines patch makes
lots simplify.
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Yes. The failure point is too late to do anything really interesting with,
> > and the old code also just causes a SIGBUS. My intention was to change the
> >
> > WARN_ONCE(!vma->anon_vma);
> >
> > into returning that SIGBUS - which is not wonderful, but is no different
> > from old failures.
>
> Not SIGBUS, but VM_FAULT_OOM, of course.
Now pagefault don't insert anon_vma anymore, right? if so, SIGBUS is better.
Now SIGBUS and VM_FAULT_OOM make different result.
SIGBUS -> kill current task
VM_FAULT_OOM -> invoke oom-killer (see pagefault_out_of_memory())
If current task can't recover proper anon_vma. we should just kill current
instead random highest badness process. otherwise !anon_vma process continue
to randomly invoke oom-killer.
Perhaps, I'm missing something.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists