[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BBE1473.5050206@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:37:55 -0400
From: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH 1/1] ibft, x86: Change reserve_ibft_region()
to find_ibft_region()
On 04/08/2010 01:28 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I am definitely ACK-ing. Sorry about not explicitly stating that.
>> The developer is Yinghai Lu, I am the co-maintainer of the iBFT driver.
>>
>> Linus, would you like me to modify the commit so that it has 'Acked-by:'
>> by me in the git tree?
>
> No, no, a sign-off is already an ack, and is "stronger" than an ack, since
> it actually also means that you send it onwards. A patch that you don't
> like you would obviously never sign off on either.
>
> I was more looking for comments from other people who know what the heck
> that early reservation system does.
Just for the record, it also looks good to me (the other co-maintainer), so:
Signed-Off-By: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
But obviously that doesn't actually constitute the acks you were /looking/
for.
--
Peter
What we need is either less corruption, or more chances to
participate in it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists