[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100408232437.GG3168@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:24:37 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, David.Woodhouse@...el.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] pci/dmar/sriov: use physfn to search drhd for VF
* Yinghai (yinghai.lu@...cle.com) wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/dmar.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/dmar.c
> @@ -534,6 +534,8 @@ dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_d
> struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru = NULL;
> struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit *drhd;
>
> + dev = pci_physfn(dev);
> +
Yeah, we typically don't have enough VF's to wrap bus numbers, or we're
under a catchall IOMMU. In the catchall case both vf->bus and vf->pf->bus
will have the same domain (segment) regardless of whether we have large
VF count or big offset/stride. So, I suppose this could be done inside
of dmar_pci_device_match().
Otherwise, I think you'd want to add the same thing to
dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit() since it's the same device scopes there.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists