[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100408061846.GA29184@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 23:18:46 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <ext-heikki.krogerus@...ia.com>
Cc: ext Michal Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
Rupesh Gujare <rupeshgujare@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] USB: testusb: imported David Brownell's USB
testing application
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:10:00AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If this is going into kernel then..
>
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:41:34PM +0200, ext Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > + if ((c = open ("/proc/bus/usb/devices", O_RDONLY)) < 0) {
> > + fputs ("usbfs files are missing\n", stderr);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
>
> Is this needed?
>
> > +
> > + /* collect and list the test devices */
> > + if (ftw ("/proc/bus/usb", find_testdev, 3) != 0) {
>
> How about "/dev/bus/usb" instead? Some distributions do not enable
> sysfs in their default kernels anymore.
You mean 'usbfs' not 'sysfs', right?
And yes, this probably should be fixed, patches are always welcome :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists