[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EAEEEBBE07F4F24C89FEF850CF8C77420142A21107@shzsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:36:15 +0800
From: "Zhao, Leifu" <leifu.zhao@...el.com>
To: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] race condition between __purge_vmap_area_lazy() and
free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush()
Hi all,
I found a bug in 2.6.28 kernel and got the fix for it, see below bug description, log information and the patch. As I know this bug still exists in at least 2.6.32 kernel. I am new in the kernel development process, can someone tell me what should proceed next?
Bug description:
There is race condition between function __purge_vmap_area_lazy() and free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush() in vmalloc.c of kernel. In function free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush(), if va->flags is updated and then is preempted to run __purge_vmap_area_lazy() before updating vmap_lazy_nr, then vmap_lazy_nr used in function __purge_vmap_area_lazy() has incorrect value, therefore cause the crash(due to run BUG_ON function). So the updating va->flags and vmap_lazy_nr must execute atomicly, the solution is to use spinlock to protect updating va->flags and vmap_lazy_nr.
Captured log information:
kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:507!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT
last sysfs file: /sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
Modules linked in: avcap_nxp(P) avcap_synthetic(P) avcap_core(P) pvrsrvkm
alsa_shim(P) snd_usb_audio ]
Pid: 1022, comm: Audio_Timing Tainted: P (2.6.28 #1)
EIP: 0060:[<c01537d5>] EFLAGS: 00010297 CPU: 0
EIP is at __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x1b1/0x1b5
EAX: c4e1e000 EBX: c04e0cec ECX: c4e1fc9c EDX: c04e0d04
ESI: 000001e2 EDI: c4e1fcc4 EBP: c4e1fcc0 ESP: c4e1fc98
Patch:
--- linux-2.6.28/mm/vmalloc.c.orig 2010-04-10 14:16:47.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.28/mm/vmalloc.c 2010-04-10 14:19:03.000000000 +0800
@@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ static unsigned long lazy_max_pages(void
static atomic_t vmap_lazy_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(purge_lock);
/*
* Purges all lazily-freed vmap areas.
*
@@ -480,7 +481,6 @@ static atomic_t vmap_lazy_nr = ATOMIC_IN
static void __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end,
int sync, int force_flush)
{
- static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(purge_lock);
LIST_HEAD(valist);
struct vmap_area *va;
int nr = 0;
@@ -556,8 +556,10 @@ static void purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
*/
static void free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush(struct vmap_area *va)
{
+ spin_lock(&purge_lock);
va->flags |= VM_LAZY_FREE;
atomic_add((va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT, &vmap_lazy_nr);
+ spin_unlock(&purge_lock);
if (unlikely(atomic_read(&vmap_lazy_nr) > lazy_max_pages()))
try_purge_vmap_area_lazy();
}
Signed-off-by: Leifu Zhao <Leifu.zhao@...el.com>
Best regards,
Leifu Zhao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists