lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:58:00 +0200
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] mm: preemptibility -v2

Hi Peter,

On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:17:37 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> The side-effects are that we can finally make mmu_gather preemptible, something
> which lots of people have wanted to do for a long time.

Yes, that is a good thing. With the preemptible mmu_gather s390 will
use less IDTEs (that is the instruction that flushes all TLBs for a
given address space) on a full flush. Good :-)

> This patch-set seems to build and boot on my x86_64 machines and even builds a
> kernel. I've also attempted powerpc and sparc, which I've compile tested with
> their respective defconfigs, remaining are (afaikt the rest uses the generic
> tlb bits):
> 
>  - s390
>  - ia64
>  - arm
>  - superh
>  - um
> 
> From those, s390 and ia64 look 'interesting', arm and superh seem very similar
> and should be relatively easy (-rt has a patchlet for arm iirc).

To get the 'interesting' TLB flushing on s390 working again you need
this patch:

--
[PATCH] s390: preemptible mmu_gather

From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>

Adapt the stand-alone s390 mmu_gather implementation to the new
preemptible mmu_gather interface.

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -28,45 +28,51 @@
 #include <asm/smp.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
-#define TLB_NR_PTRS	1
-#else
-#define TLB_NR_PTRS	508
-#endif
-
 struct mmu_gather {
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	unsigned int fullmm;
 	unsigned int nr_ptes;
 	unsigned int nr_pxds;
-	void *array[TLB_NR_PTRS];
+	unsigned int max;
+	void **array;
+	void *local[8];
 };
 
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct mmu_gather, mmu_gathers);
-
-static inline struct mmu_gather *tlb_gather_mmu(struct mm_struct *mm,
-						unsigned int full_mm_flush)
+static inline void __tlb_alloc_pages(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
 {
-	struct mmu_gather *tlb = &get_cpu_var(mmu_gathers);
+	unsigned long addr = __get_free_pages(GFP_ATOMIC, 0);
+
+	if (addr) {
+		tlb->array = (void *) addr;
+		tlb->max = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(void *);
+	}
+}
 
+static inline void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
+				  struct mm_struct *mm,
+				  unsigned int full_mm_flush)
+{
 	tlb->mm = mm;
+	tlb->max = ARRAY_SIZE(tlb->local);
+	tlb->array = tlb->local;
 	tlb->fullmm = full_mm_flush || (num_online_cpus() == 1) ||
 		(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1 && mm == current->active_mm);
-	tlb->nr_ptes = 0;
-	tlb->nr_pxds = TLB_NR_PTRS;
 	if (tlb->fullmm)
 		__tlb_flush_mm(mm);
-	return tlb;
+	else
+		__tlb_alloc_pages(tlb);
+	tlb->nr_ptes = 0;
+	tlb->nr_pxds = tlb->max;
 }
 
 static inline void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
 				 unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
-	if (!tlb->fullmm && (tlb->nr_ptes > 0 || tlb->nr_pxds < TLB_NR_PTRS))
+	if (!tlb->fullmm && (tlb->nr_ptes > 0 || tlb->nr_pxds < tlb->max))
 		__tlb_flush_mm(tlb->mm);
 	while (tlb->nr_ptes > 0)
 		pte_free(tlb->mm, tlb->array[--tlb->nr_ptes]);
-	while (tlb->nr_pxds < TLB_NR_PTRS)
+	while (tlb->nr_pxds < tlb->max)
 		/* pgd_free frees the pointer as region or segment table */
 		pgd_free(tlb->mm, tlb->array[tlb->nr_pxds++]);
 }
@@ -79,7 +85,8 @@ static inline void tlb_finish_mmu(struct
 	/* keep the page table cache within bounds */
 	check_pgt_cache();
 
-	put_cpu_var(mmu_gathers);
+	if (tlb->array != tlb->local)
+		free_pages((unsigned long) tlb->array, 0);
 }
 
 /*

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ