[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23601.1270804291@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:11:31 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/4] RCU: Better explain the condition parameter of rcu_dereference_check()
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> + * bar = rcu_dereference_check(foo->bar, rcu_read_lock_held() ||
> + * lockdep_is_held(&foo->lock),
> + * atomic_read(&foo->usage) == 0);
As pointed out by Yong Zhang, the comma after lockdep_is_held() should be a
||.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists