[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100409165735.GB2421@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:57:35 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/4] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and
rcu_dereference_protected
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:24:18AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 09 avril 2010 à 10:10 +0100, David Howells a écrit :
> > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +#define rcu_access_pointer(p) ((void *)ACCESS_ONCE(p))
> > > ...
> > > +#define rcu_access_pointer(p) ((void *)ACCESS_ONCE(p))
> >
> > There's no difference between your two versions of rcu_access_pointer(), so
> > you could move that whole construct outside of the #ifdef'ed section.
> >
> > Other than that:
> >
> > Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
>
> I also prefer to keep type checking if possible
>
> #define rcu_access_pointer(p) (ACCESS_ONCE(p))
Yikes! I was obsessing on preventing people from dereferencing the
pointer, but you are quite right, they might be comparing it to a
constant pointer to check for array bounds or for use of a statically
allocated emergency-pool item.
I will fix and resubmit.
> Other than that:
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists